Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Michael Valente
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:27, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Joseph Michael Valente (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD by article creator (probably WP:AUTO) with reason: Deletion due to GS research results is a poor measurable. Valente's work is unprecedented in bringing Deaf [sic] community member's [sic] "voices" to research and mainstream society. Within the global Deaf community, Valente's work is well-known. See Utube vi.
Subject does not appear to satisfy WP:ACADEMIC or WP:GNG. No evidence of him winning any notable award in his field of research and no evidence his work has been widely cited with author acknowledging lack of GS results. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 06:41, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Only 1 cite on GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:15, 2 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Besides, really close to being a résumé. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:23, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.