Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josep Armengol Jover

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Josep Armengol Jover

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article to meet the standards of WP:N due to lack of multiple, non-trivial references in reliable, third-party sources. There's no Wikipedia policy on the oldest anything being automatically notable by the encyclopedia's standards (also based on long-term consensus, including most recently the redirecting of this World's oldest person). Thus we default to the general notability guidelines and any material of encyclopedic merit can be included on the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia. Canadian Paul 17:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep They were indeed notable, they were at time of death oldest living person. DN-boards1 (talk) 17:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC) — DN-boards1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

— Note to closing admin: DN-boards1 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.

Not according to Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Canadian Paul 18:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have a solution. We can userfy all of these that have been nominated. DN-boards1 (talk) 18:04, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per WP:Notability (people): People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.Isambard Kingdom (talk) 19:31, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even if notable, WP:NOPAGE would apply. EEng (talk) 11:48, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are not enough sources list to support notability for this page.TH1980 (talk) 03:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Human longevity is not a contest. This article reads as if it were. That's not encyclopedic. The article cites no reliable sources. The subject is not notable. The talk-page bears a promise of sources to follow. It's dated 2007 and it's signed by a now-banned editor. WP:SNOW? David in DC (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Oldest people#Chronological list of the verified oldest living men since 1973 NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:17, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.