Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josef Wagner (painter)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Josef Wagner (painter)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very tricky sourcing problem, unable to find reliable secondary sources which provide coverage of this Czech artist, not to be confused with 19th century and earlier-20th century artists, such as the 1901-born sculptor [1] of the same name. There are some non-trivial claims that certainly go towards notability if they can be verified, but at present this is a long-term unreferenced BLP. joe decker ^{talk to me} 17:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC) Withdrawn (see below) --joe decker ^{talk to me} 20:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —AllyD (talk) 19:27, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've added an Interwiki to the Czech equivalent page, which in turn led to the National Library database where the Louis Mossot authored catalogue could perhaps go some way to confirming notability. But not finding much else. AllyD (talk) 20:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep IOn the assumption that the article was written in good faith by a one-article editor who knew something about the artist, I googled:"josef wagner" Holešovice. (since the article states that he was known for work portraying this city with a unique name) the search [2] produced 357 very persuasive hits. Mostly in Czech, but, just scanning the first page, also an intervidw on a French radio program. Keep and hope for improvement.I.Casaubon (talk) 17:43, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw as nom -- Nice job adding those sources, the French source in particular is substantial, bravo! --joe decker ^{talk to me} 20:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.