Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jose Gentile
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to not conform to WP:BIO, and may be WP:VAIN, or advertising. Cursory Google searching did not reveal any further relevant info about this person. Em3rald 21:21, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - vanity article, written by the subject. michaelCurtis talk+ contributions 22:10, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, potentially userfy. --Tone 23:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, They are tons of articles about people with the same level of notority in this site.Also, please, check www.josegentile.com for complete bio and articles that may prove notority. also http://www.rock.com.ar/bios/2/2107.shtml , http://www.artistdirect.com/nad/music/artist/bio/0,,3057299,00.html#bio , and more --User:The Authore 3:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- This and the editor's comment below were added by User:71.137.234.225, whose only edits are to this AFD and the article in question, User:The Author has only two contribs. I'm not sure what's going on here, but it smells fishy. Mak (talk) 14:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Eivindt@c 09:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not wikified, sounds like an advertisement, not linked by any Wikipedia article, notability unclear Deleteme42 00:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DVD+ R/W 00:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I guess the user wants you to look at Los Nuevos Coleccionistas de Pasillos? He wrote it on top of this deletion debate and then moved the entire page there. Mak (talk) 23:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I've edited the article and linked to a page so that it can make sense. As I read in the policies about entertainers, the subject is qualified for a written article--User:The Authore 3:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC) second "vote" struck to avoid confusion. Mak (talk) 14:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]Keep, Please, read the edited article and its links. This is an honest article, Mak's comment ("it smell fishy") is not professional and it's offensive. Please, read Gentile's bio and related articles and Wikipedia's entertainments policies, you'll find the subject qualified.--User:The Authore 9:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)- Comment I am not commenting on the article, rather the editing which is going on at this AfD. If you are indeed User:The Author, please sign in when editing AfD's. Also, please only put Keep or Delete once, and put Comment in front of any comments, otherwise it's confusing to the closing admin. I did not mean to offend you, so I'm sorry if I did. Mak (talk) 17:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.