Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jos Clijsters
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jos Clijsters[edit]
- Jos Clijsters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Bio of a CEO. I prodded it a while ago, it was deprodded due to his name being mentioned in some sources. But is this enough? No reliable source seems to focus on him, he is mentioned on a side, occasionally quoted briefly, in his capacity as a CEO. Only sources on him seem to be sites like [1], which don't look very reliable. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:52, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Plenty of source material to be found, e.g. here and here, and plenty of pretty detailed profiles like this. -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 07:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - for a banking CEO, references found on reuters.com are relevant, reliable and valuable -- Bvlg (talk) 07:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Having looked through the sources and news items, I have to agree that he meets WP:GNG and other WP:BASIC guidelines. This amounts to substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources. --Batard0 (talk) 08:46, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.