Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Sánchez Peñate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Of note is that per WP:NEXIST, topic notability is not based upon the state of sourcing within articles. Some sources were presented, but nobody else then provided input regarding their veracity relative to notability guidelines. Furthermore, nobody addressed the notion in the nomination that the article is possibly promotional. After two relistings, no consensus has ensued. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

José Sánchez Peñate[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible promotion of the company. No reliable source that mention the company, except Bloomberg. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 03:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 03:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 03:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 03:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Significant coverage: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Much of it is local and relates to it going into administration, but still passes WP:NCORP. 192.76.8.95 (talk) 23:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:34, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify - currently wholly unsourced, so not ready for mainspace is the best definition for this article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Modussiccandi (talk) 11:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify as above, there appears to be potential in this topic but the article as currently written is unsourced. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.