Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Roberto de Lima Andrade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:09, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

José Roberto de Lima Andrade

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article doesn't pass WP:NACADEMIC or WP:GNG. No in-depth coverage on reliable or independent sources. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 04:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 04:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 04:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. No evidence of notability; searching Google Scholar for author:jr-de-lima-andrade found what look like his publications, but without enough citations to justify WP:PROF#C1. "Director General of the School of Public Administration and Management of the State of Sergipe" might make a claim to #C6 if that were a significant standalone institute, but I can barely verify that the "Escola de Administração Pública e Gestão Governamental de Sergipe" exists, and I doubt "Secretary of State for Tourism of Sergipe" passes WP:NPOL. That all said, copying and pasting the identical nomination statement on seven rapid-fire AfDs [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] doesn't make a strong case that the nominator has considered these cases individually or done the searching requested by WP:BEFORE. So although I tend to agree with the nominator in this case, I think a trout may still be due. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.