Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Manuel Mójica Legarre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WjBscribe 18:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

José Manuel Mójica Legarre[edit]

This is a biography of a living Spanish writer, author of two books about history of cooking (published at a regional level) and one novel. While the article style is a bit clumsily enthusiastic about Mr Legarre and lacks sources, my main concern is that it does not seem to fulfill the conditions of Wikipedia:Notability (people) ; I strongly doubt that Mr Legarre may "have been the subject of published secondary sources", he has not received "significant recognized awards or honors" and none of his books "has won significant critical attention". The same page has been simultaneously created on :fr and :es Wikipedias, and a similar deletion request is currently discussed on :fr (see fr:Wikipédia:Pages à supprimer/José Manuel Mójica Legarre) French Tourist 18:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Not sure I know enough to say this with certainity, but all I can find about him are Spanish pages that mention the name in passing and are not specifically about him. At this point, I don't think he is notable enough to keep. Shruti14 (talk • contribs) 18:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep J.M. Mójica's book La gastronomía en tiempos de San Francisco Javier is a reference in Spain concerning the gastronomy during the 16th century. It has been presented in several important spanish newspapers. Same success for his most recent book, La llama frente al huracán. SalomonCeb 19:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
comment FWIW, at this point the more sophisticated discussion at frWP [1] is evenly divided. The page at esWP [2] has not yet been challenged. DGG (talk) 03:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Week Delete as per nom does not appear notable. Harlowraman 21:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TerriersFan 22:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per SalomonCeb Brandon97 21:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.