Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Filipe Torres
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
José Filipe Torres[edit]
- José Filipe Torres (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:BIO. almost seems WP:AUTOBIO. no significant coverage of this individual [1]. LibStar (talk) 15:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - notability is not inherited, and the sources may not all be reliable. Bearian (talk) 02:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —LibStar (talk) 13:35, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. —LibStar (talk) 13:35, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above comments. Looks like WP:ARTSPAM and I haven't found any sources to establish notability. Giving an interview on nation-branding.info and a quotation in Forbes are a good start, but they don't amount to "significant coverage" of Mr. Torres yet. Glenfarclas (talk) 02:54, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.