Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel .Bryant 00:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jory[edit]

del. about a name. `'mikkanarxi 07:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy Delete~~ "as an article about a person, group of people, band, club, company or website that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject." (CSD A7). Look at the Origin section. Just a ~~vanity page~~ autobiography. -- IslaySolomon | talk 09:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ for now. This article is nonsense. We have plenty of articles about names (see Category:Given names), and if and when someone wants to write a serious article about the name, it might be OK. --Brianyoumans 10:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have no opinion, but this article has been completely rewritten about a different subject, a film entitled Jory. Nominator and those who have expressed opinions may wish to review the current page. GassyGuy 11:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is in fact a completely different article; this one is perfectly reasonable. --Brianyoumans 09:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Since the article has changed totally, I don't see much point in keeping this discussion open. -- IslaySolomon | talk 14:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I second a speedy keep; the article's content has completely changed since it was first nominated and reviewed. Dar-Ape 20:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Deletionists like Islay are too quick to draw. He doesn't even read the article before listing it for deletion. DougHolton 04:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:No personal attacks. Then, please review both the page history of this article and reread my comment above (and IslaySolomon's own speedy keep comment directly following it) and review whether your accusation might have been a tad hasty. Thank you. GassyGuy 04:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I did not list this article for deletion, Mikkalai did, and with good reason. However, the content of the article has completely changed and, if you look above, I have actually voted to keep it. -- IslaySolomon | talk 10:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep I was the one who nominated this for a speedy delete, when I was newpage patrolling. It was patent nonsense at the time--some in-joke gibberishy blather about somebody who happened to be named Jory. In the interim, however, all that's been entirely replaced by a legitimate entry about a legitimately-notable film. That this is being considered for deletion at all is just an artifact of the review system. Let's move on. -- P L E A T H E R _talk 18:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.