Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Munoz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per consensus Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Munoz

Does not pass WP:ATHLETE: plays for an amateur team, and not at the highest amateur level. Several other team-mates are currently at AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Poloni, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Lopez (2nd nomination)) and the team is currently heading towards a WP:SNOW deletion. (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Bernardino Krew) No other reliable sources to verify or otherwise establish notability. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 00:01, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No reliable sources found to verify notability. — X S G 05:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:07, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable in the slightest -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:07, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete has not played in a fully-professional league. --Jimbo^[online] 12:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails WP:ATHLETE. Giant Snowman 14:23, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails WP:ATHLETE. Also fails WP:NOTE. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 09:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, not yet notable. Recreate if and when --ClubOranje^Talk 06:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.