Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordy Baar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!?) 05:34, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity. Ifnord 14:05, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Contrary to what some people say, the Mischief Masters do exist and therefor deserve a spot in the Wikipedia. The Mischief Masters haven't reached national fame yet, but they're working very hard to do so by producing products like their movie A New Master. People who don't believe it should check their IMDB page. For further proof they could look at the biggest Dutch DVD site DVD-home since they devoted a artikel to the Masters. Doubters will see for themselves that there IS a movie made. The page is written in Dutch, but does contain screenshots. I do agree that there isn't a Mischeif Masters series since there is only one movie made with a second production coming.
The url to the article mentioned: http://www.dvd-home.nl/nieuws/oud2004.htm#8 The Masters are displayed just above the "Augustus" (August) banner.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Unstoppableforce (talk • contribs) 2005-10-19 14:16:56 UTV
- It is a common misconception that Wikipedia is simply a collection of everything that exists. Not everything that exists deserves a spot on here. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Aecis 17:24, 19 October 2005 (UTC) (Ook een Nederlander)[reply]
- Delete per nom; the IMDb entry is for one self-produced apparently unreleased short of the sort likely filmed on a mass-market camcorder. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 15:47, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Tonywalton | Talk 16:44, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm sure the movie exists, I just don't think it's particularly significant in the grand scale of things. Neither, by extension, is the guy who made it. Just because it's verifiably out there, doesn't mean it matters to a significant portion of the world at large. That's not an insult, that's just a simple fact. -- Captain Disdain 20:32, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Lomn and Aecis and the reasoning in the related discussion. - Mgm|(talk) 08:22, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable person and film Bwithh 08:32, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:12, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.