Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JordyVision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JordyVision

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Original reasoning was (and still is) - I cannot find enough significant coverage of this person to say that they pass WP:MUSIC, or even WP:GNG at this point in time. The article does not contain independent sources to establish said notability.'. The entry of the record label of this DJ (Prowess Records) has been deleted, so this BLP goes to the community for discussion. ArcAngel (talk) ) 12:56, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:58, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm going with Delete because there are very few notable sources for biography aside from MySpace, Twitter, Facebook, blogs, YouTube. I didn't see anything notable on both a Google and Yahoo! search. SwisterTwister talk 22:06, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:RS and WP:INDY. No evidence in the given sources for notability established independently of the subject. I couldn't find any independent, reliable, non-promotional sources in a Google search. Richwales (talk · contribs) 01:30, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.