Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Samuels-Thomas (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 05:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Samuels-Thomas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 07:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 17:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Fails NHOCKEY but passes GNG via significant coverage in multiple reliable sources discussed in the 1st AfD. Rlendog (talk) 19:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes GNG as per Rlendog. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 15:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:16, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Samuels-Thomas passes WP:GNG. See a listing of those sources in the first AFD. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 08:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject passes GNG. Shallownotthou (talk) 15:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He still fails for the time being as an ice hockey player, however it is much easier today to find articles about the subject than it was at the time of the previous AfD. The subject can now comfortably pass the WP:GNG. Deadman137 (talk) 21:37, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per all above and the sources brought forth in the first AfD. Ejgreen77 (talk) 11:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.