Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Hasay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - PeaceNT (talk) 10:22, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Hasay[edit]

Non-notable high school runner. Corvus cornix_talk 06:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete NN. Maybe a COI too based on the name of the articles creater. The whole article reads like a resume since it's noting more than a list of her perosnal accomplishments. TJ Spyke 07:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not enough to meet our standards as an athlete need to have competed in a major international competition. Punkmorten (talk) 12:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - assuming those times are accurate she would be one of the top high school runners in the country. Plus the sports illustrated article (linked at the bottom) is rather significant coverage. --T-rex 15:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The times are correct and national class. She was a national high school champion as a freshman and a three-time national under-20 (Junior) champion as a freshman and sophomore. As a sophomore she was second in the world in the under-20 World Junior Championships (a very major international competition as mentioned in Punkmorten's entry above).She qualified for the same meet the year prior by winning the US Junior Championships but was denied entry because international rules specifiy a 'too-young' age of 15. At 17 she is still an active and improving athlete with the prospects of many more national championships and international competitions/championships in the future. --Fizbin (talk) 00:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The notice of potential deletion was removed from the Hasay article over two days ago, so many interested parties may have no idea this discussion is taking place--Fizbin (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.