Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Fung

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bishonen | talk 00:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Fung

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination on behalf of an IP editor, whose rationale is copied verbatim below. On the merits, I make no recommendation. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 16:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The subject matter does not meet notability guidelines, with a lack of reliable non-trivial independent sources referring to Jordan Fung. There is also a huge conflict of interest as most of the page is written by and created by Jordan Fung himself.220.246.180.78 (talk) 13:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed all advertisement-like content, adding magazine, newspaper, TV, and radio excerpts. I have removed the COI and advert tag. Hope this helps. 112.119.171.234 (talk) 13:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see some interviews with this 14-year-old entrepreneur, but the company Pedosa Innovation doesn't seem notable (it redirects to him), nor are his awards, recognitions, and competitions. Not seeing anything that justifies the article. Plus there's the COI concern. Timmyshin (talk) 08:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. He does have that one article, but that's it. The others are about the company. He seems smart and successful. It's just WP:TOOSOON. SW3 5DL (talk) 03:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep due to winning an HK government innovation award (website includes extensive discussion of his work [1]) and having a mainstream publication interview him [2]. Deryck C. 18:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He has recently been selected as the Global Winner of the World Summit Award 2016 [3] which is a highly-recognised award organised by the United Nations. Not to mention the media coverage (online, printed, TV, and Radio) he has. 45.64.241.175 (talk) 23:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as of now only one source meets WP:GNG standards. Since when do we allow WordPress blogs as source?--Skyfiler (talk) 17:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.