Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonny ClockWorks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 15:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jonny ClockWorks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sure there are far worse articles (especially fabricated ones which I search for hungrily) but my searches found nothing to suggest better improvement with the best results, here and here. He's accomplished quite a bit but, again, there are sourcing issues for which I'm not seeing enough possible improvement. Pinging the editors I think would be most interested, @DGG, NatGertler, and Mandarax: (a few other editors I saw are not active). SwisterTwister talk 23:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - some local coverage, including locally-feeling coverage on a national site. I'm not finding signs that it goes further than that. --Nat Gertler (talk) 00:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:17, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 11:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom and above editor. The coverage doesn't rise to the level of notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.