Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Pease (creative director)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 00:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Pease (creative director)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the requirements of WP:CREATIVE or WP:BIO. Only poor quality coverage in relation to Australia's Next Top Model e.g.. Other coverage only mentions him in passing e.g.. (Cleanup of an old paid editor User:Neurosciency). SmartSE (talk) 17:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as a puff piece about a non-notable subject written on contract by a paid editor. Even if the notability bar were passed, WP:TNT applies. The Dissident Aggressor 21:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 08:32, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. promotional article about of person of no apparent notability DGG ( talk ) 02:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--SmartSE, DA, and DGG are all correct, as am I. Drmies (talk) 02:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - BLP of a behind-the-scenes staff person on a reality show, very run of the mill. Bearian (talk) 16:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I simply found nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 06:41, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.