Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Gray (writer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 05:08, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Gray (writer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fringe writer; no evidence of any specific relevance within his community. Simonm223 (talk) 15:33, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not enough references to pass GNG after a search of article databases. Jeremy112233 (talk) 19:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a non-notable fringe theorist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Other than a brief mention in this book, I can't really find anything to show that he's particularly noteworthy. Even the community of which he's a member don't seem to have taken any particular notice of him, not that we could normally use any of those as RS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:32, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
CommentIf he's very influential within his own community and this could be clearly referenced that might be enough to confer borderline notability on him. My AfD was put up because he seems to have failed that test. Simonm223 (talk) 14:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.