Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Avigdori
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Requested by author G7 Ronhjones (Talk) 19:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jonathan Avigdori[edit]
- Jonathan Avigdori (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional bio of subject lacking notability. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. None of independent sources provided have significant coverage of Avigdori. Nothing more found. Bio claims he "starred in Steven Spielberg's Munich (film)" but it was only a minor part. It says he is "known" for his work in The Uint and 24 but his parts there are as Arab Man and IRK Security Guard, both in single episodes. Avigdori lacks significant roles in multiple notable productions. Bio asserts importance through other peoples acheivements but notability is not inherited like that. Bio uses puffery (eg. "ground-breaking", "innovative", "unique") to exagerate claims of notability. Combining the lack of coverage, the lack of significant roles, the puffery and the misinformation this page should be deleted. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You can nominate the article for deletion. It was already placed in the speedy deletion category but the speedy deletion was stopped by the admin. I don't support the article any longer. If the administration wants to delete the article, I won't be giving any foul reasoning to put up a debate.
--Inlandmamba (talk) 10:45, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You can nominate the article for deletion. It was already placed in the speedy deletion category but the speedy deletion was stopped by the admin. I don't support the article any longer. If the administration wants to delete the article, I won't be giving any foul reasoning to put up a debate.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 05:39, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Not notable as an actor. Any notability would have to derive from his business ventures (MoonQuake, Actors Pages, etc). Since one of the first hits for Actors Pages is "Is actors pages a scam?" I'm not very hopeful, but not done a thorough search yet. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.