Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Alston
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. LFaraone 00:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Jonathan Alston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Orphan article. No mention of him playing for Seahawks - except that he had been released in 2007. Google can't show a current team.The NFL stats for him (see link in infobox) show no matches played. If he hasn't played he isn't notable Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (articulate) @ 11:25, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm unable to confirm any notability at this time. I would change my position if it were presented. No prejudice to re-create at a later date if notability is established.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.