Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonah Bryson (filmmaker)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:15, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jonah Bryson (filmmaker)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a young filmmaker notable only as the co-director of a single 10-minute short documentary film, citing no reliable source coverage to support it — the only sources here are an article he wrote and an article his more established co-director wrote, making them both primary sources that count for nothing toward establishing WP:GNG. As always, a Wikipedia article is not something that every film director automatically gets to have just because he exists — reliable source coverage, demonstrating that he passes WP:CREATIVE, is what it takes, and until then it's just WP:TOOSOON. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when his notability and sourceability can be demonstrated better than this. Bearcat (talk) 00:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now at best as there's nothing to suggest even minimally better general notability. SwisterTwister talk 08:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the article can always be recreated if the subject passes notability in the future. Tivanir2 (talk) 19:53, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see significant coverage in reliable sources yet. It's probably too soon for an article. The film itself isn't exactly the most notable thing in the world, but I guess his article could be redirected there. I generally don't think it's worth redirecting disambiguated, low-profile individuals, though. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with the views stated above. If Jonah becomes better known in the future, he may then warrant a Wikipedia entry. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:42, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:BIO, WP:FILMMAKER - Does not have substantial coverage in multiple independant sources. A Highbeam search gave 0 results, google showed 9 mentions in news items. Does not meet the specific requirements pointed out at WP:FILMMAKER. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 07:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.