Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Jashni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete, after greatly extended time for discussion. bd2412 T 03:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Jashni[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a connected-editor puff-piece, with enough references to give the impression that the person is notable. However, I believe that notability is not established; Jashni gets a number of passing mentions, as a "creative officer" (here) or as one of a team of producers. I see no in-depth coverage of him or of his achievements, nothing to to suggest that he is any different from the thousands of behind-the-scenes people who help make notable films happen, but do not in that process themselves become notable. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:58, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:58, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:58, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Primefac who accepted this at WP:AFC. ~Kvng (talk) 15:37, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meh... I don't remember much other than keeping tabs on it for a while after accepting. Was definitely in the category of a "borderline accept". I have no strong opinions but would personally say that he's not notable just for being someone who has done things. Primefac (talk) 16:08, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Kvng – I'd meant to do that but it seems to have slipped my mind. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

commment thousands of behind-the-scenes people, well' I wouldn't call President a one of "thousands of behind-the scenes people". Staszek Lem (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Borderline keep. NOtability's are just guidelines to weed unquestionalbe cases. This one in borderline hence special consideration. I's say by the sum of facts (President; twice direct producer; press coverage, although routine, but verifies his activities, not just PR hype. Staszek Lem (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:SIGCOV. Found him in 8 magazines in the first 16 references, discussing a wide range of films at Legendary Entertainment. Seems to be ok. scope_creep^Talk 10:36, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.