Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon FX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Not a great deal of discussion, but I doubt much more will come from another relisting. Arguments on the lack of notability seem pretty solid. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Amended to explicitly note as a soft delete, given low participation. -- Euryalus (talk) 10:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jon FX[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable individual. Lacks coverage about him in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete another in a long line of articles on non-notable music producers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:48, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.