Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Colwell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 10:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Colwell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO and WP:ARTIST. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's also an autobiography. Why do people still make their WP name the same name are the article they are creating? ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐁT₳LKᐃ 21:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Much Apologies for making the page an Autobiography. The reason as to why I put myself on Wikipedia is due to the positive impact I have made on my hometown and community, and the importance in Radio I hold in Perry County, Kentucky. I feel as though the article should stand, due to myself having a credible source for the article Here, but I'm still new to Wikipedia and want to know what I can change about the article to make sure that it can stay on the site. Any help is appreciated! (talk) 23:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy. If the subject becomes more clearly established as notable, the page can be restored to the mainspace. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete lacks significant coverage in RS does not meet GNG.Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete Self promotion. Lacks significant independent sources. ShelbyMarion (talk) 13:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As Wikipedia is not a webhost, I would say not to userfy.Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:41, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The biography needs more notice from a wider field of publications than just the local paper. This seems to me to have purely local interest, with little chance of becoming regional or national. Binksternet (talk) 00:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Much apologies once again. I was unaware that the biography needed more sources than a local newspaper. I also have my celebrity interviews as references on the page, but I did not know that you also need regional or national nobility. However, I do believe one day, that I will break out into Regional Or National Nobility. (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.