Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JonTron (6th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 09:40, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JonTron[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am aware the previous discussions over this page's deletion.

However, it is looking increasingly likely that JonTron is not notable even with the loosest interpretation of wikipedia's guidelines. He has not made any videos in nearly a year, has had no appearances in the news. The only reason it looks like his approval was ever accepted was his short lived controversy. This combined with multiple discussions on the JonTron talk page makes me think this is the case.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Personauncommitted (talk • contribs) 13:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per my points above. Short lived fame and questionable notability do not mean a wikipedia page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Personauncommitted (talk • contribs) 13:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and early close. Notability is not temporary. Previous discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JonTron (5th nomination)) was "keep", not "no consensus". We do not need to re-legislate this article every two years. –IagoQnsi (talk) 21:10, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: User:Personauncommitted is a brand new editor -- creating this AfD is their first and only edit. –IagoQnsi (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I stand by my statements in the last discussion, the sources do not measure up to the reliable quality sources we need.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:13, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He is still notable even if he hasn't made a video in a year. Just because there are no more videos doesn't mean we should delete the article. Supergodzilla2090 (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, think there's enough here in terms of sources to pass WP:GNG. — 🦊 03:05, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per IagoQnsi. Raymond1922 (talk) 18:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. This is ridiculous, JonTron's notability has been discussed at length by this point. After his rants and the subsequent fallout, reliable sources only have reported more on the person. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.