Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jolly Shandy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Carlsberg Group. Black Kite (talk) 23:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jolly Shandy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:PRODUCT. Was prodded on day on creation, which was too early, but cannot now be prodded again, so it has to come to AfD. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 19:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Little mention in reliable sources. A company being notable doesn't mean all of its products are. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge mention of the drink into the Carlsberg article or if there's a list of products article, that one. Shadowjams (talk) 22:22, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Merge as above would also be fine. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:57, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Carlsberg have over 500 brands, and simple beer lists are discouraged per WP:BeerList. Beer brands come and go. There are thousands and thousands of beer brands. If a brand is notable, it is worth mentioning somewhere on Wikipedia. If it is simply one of thousands, and may be gone by next week, then we discourage including it. There are no significant mentions of this product outside of advertising, blogs and ratings sites. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 22:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.