Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jolie O'Dell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 05:33, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jolie O'Dell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article does not meet WP:N or WP:BIO standards, and the article contains no reliable sources. This article (which was created by an account since blocked for sockpuppetry) is more akin to a LinkedIn page than an encyclopedia entry, and a thin one at that. Circumspect (talk) 09:17, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 10:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 10:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete little to nothing independent and reliable on the subject. —Ed!^(talk) 14:17, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - spectacularly non-notable, fails WP:BIO ukexpat (talk) 22:41, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This verges on "no indication of notability". הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 01:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This person does not meet WP:BASIC for a standalone Wikipedia article. I found this passing mention in a Forbes article and this primary-source article, but not much else. Not enough coverage exists about the person, (as opposed to article's the person has authored, which are available in searches), to meet WP:BASIC. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:33, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.