Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jokerz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Davewild (talk) 20:34, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jokerz[edit]

Jokerz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another slice of comics fancruft with no mention from outside the primary fictional material itself. Per many, many similar articles, we do not consider that alone to achieve notability. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:21, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Plenty of coverage with relation to Gotham City Imposters such as [1], [2], [3], [4]. Not to mention coverage with relation to the comics (see [5], [6]). All of these in addition to increasing use in all mediums related to the "Batman" universe (comic books, animated series, animated films, video games, etc) suggests notability. ~ RobTalk 16:16, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rather keep as this was a mention-worthy villain of Batman Beyond and can be improved. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 13:04, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.