Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Shacklett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Shacklett[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and with zero GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 05:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 13:40, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There actually is a GNews hit here, but it's an extremely passing mention in a 1973 Milwaukee Journal issue. I can't find any information on the DownBeat Magazine article supposedly about one of his recordings, but even if I could I don't think it would meet WP:MUSICBIO: "multiple non-trivial published works." I wouldn't oppose recreation if more can be found, and I'm willing to believe there might be more for a seventies-era jazz musician, but as it stands I'm afraid the article doesn't pass notability. Glenfarclas (talk) 03:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the claims for notability are rather slight. A Google book search found this. But I don't see the coverage that would establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 19:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.