Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Rich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 03:01, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Rich[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable wrestler from a small professional wrestling organization. There are a lot of hits for "Johnny Rich", but many don't seem to be connected to Southeast Championship Wrestling as the subject of this article is. see this search for example. Joshua Scott (talk) 19:51, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 20:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki♥311 01:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose to limit the searches to "Southeast CHampionship Wrestling" is wrong, he's worked for plenty of other places and it's deceptive to discount any result that does not specificially mention SCW. MPJ -DK 05:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's even mentioned in the article that he worked for plenty of other companies, so by your own admission "there are lots of hits for Johnny Rich", in other words your reason for nomination it is invalid. MPJ -DK 05:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion to you is to find a reliable source that backs up at least a portion of the material in the article, and add that reference to the article. I'm happy to retract my nomination if you can find sources. Joshua Scott (talk) 07:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So no comment on the intentional reduction of hits? Alrighty then. MPJ -DK 20:53, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Quantity isn't the issue. Quality is. Joshua Scott's request for reliable sources is a valid one. - Richfife (talk) 05:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable wrestler. ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 00:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability requirements.--Jarhed (talk) 07:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:N. What has he actually done that is notable? There is no source that he is actually Tommy Rich's cousin amongst numerous other sourcing failures. If this wrestler truly is notable someone needs to prove it quick smart. !! Justa Punk !! 12:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.