Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Knorr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) ansh666 11:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Knorr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found links here, here, here and here but I'm still questionable to its notability and improvement (with this staying the same since June 2007). Pinging RJFJR an Gilliam. SwisterTwister talk 23:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. This article from The Bryan Times verifies the content, but, on the other hand, the entire Wikipedia article seems like a blatant copyright violation of it. It's possible the newspaper article is itself based on a press release. I'm not really sure what to say. I guess I'll try to clean up the article a bit. Most of the awards and honors seem regional, but the USPS award was also mentioned in this article by The Toledo Blade, which seems to use awfully similar phrasing to the Wikipedia/Bryan Times article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 18:32, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 03:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.