Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John elkington
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 02:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- John elkington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I don't see any statement complying with WP:BIO. asenine t/c 05:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep per non-trivial coverage independent reliable sources (WP:N) in the article. Move to proper capitalisation though. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 08:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Already tagged appropriately. Article was created today, and deserves the time to be cleaned up. Review periodically to confirm NPOV and whether article is promotional (unable to determine until construction of article is complete) Rotovia (talk) 12:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep Even though the article is in fairly poor shape right now, I think notability exists and can be verified by WP:RS. It just needs to be cleaned up. SWik78 (talk) 14:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. the article contains references that demonstrate notability. Anyone who objects to the fact that the references aren't formatted correctly can easily fix that by editing. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.