Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Vega
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
John Vega[edit]
- John Vega (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced BLP since 2006 of uncertain notability. Unsourced BLP cleanup - I am neutral Black Kite 12:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 13:22, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, has no references, links to no other articles. 67.79.157.50 (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There is no way of knowing whether the material asserted here is notable without looking for reviews and other sources. Per WP BeFORE, the nominator is asked to do that. BK, did you check this at all? --if you did, we wont have to recheck individually here. DGG (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- From what I could find, this is something of a puff piece. The term "award-winning" is thrown around a lot but I can find no evidence of major awards. This is obviously unsourced, but all the evidence of notability that I can find on the web comes either from his own website or from Wikipedia mirrors of this article. Perhaps others can find better. Black Kite 11:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as essentially a copyvio from [1]. I was looking for sources, and was able to update the article, but then I found the actual source. I don;t think this is important enough to justify a rewrite. This does nend to happen when one looks for verification of bios like this. DGG (talk) 00:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.