Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Tantillo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John Tantillo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG notability. With a WP:BEFORE, I could not find any reliable sources on him that gave in-depth coverage. The only significant coverage I've found are from non-independent sources, and the article looks like much of the same. (The article also oversells some of the sources out there, such as saying he "generated controversy", citing this interview on NPR.)

Two of the most reliable sources I've found are passing mentions: This Rolling Stones article mentions that a reporter (who previously was a co-worker to, and had a large falling out with, Bill O'Reilly) said that he used the term "The O'Reilly Factor" first. This NYTimes source mentions him in passing, that he was hired as a representative for the Shoup Voting Machine Corporation. Although he might be a somewhat well-known marketer, especially since he's had media appearances, I don't see any sources that shows he passes Wikipedia notability. - Whisperjanes (talk) 02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.