Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Stevenson (geologist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 01:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
John Stevenson (geologist)[edit]
- John Stevenson (geologist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability: "postdoctoral researcher" -- see Wikipedia:Notability (academics); No notability: "given a radio interview" see -- Wikipedia:Notability_(events). Original page Dr John Stevenson already deleted, possibly in relation to procedural error from my side. Mootros (talk) 20:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You kept restoring the PROD tag after it was removed and the admin did not notice that the prod was contested, but restored. Pooet (talk) 21:13, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Agree with nom. Doesn't appear to meet the WP:PROFESSOR criteria. Shadowjams (talk) 20:52, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- delete as per nom - UtherSRG (talk) 23:44, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. He clearly does not pass WP:PROF and I don't think his role as a radio-interviewee is enough to pass WP:GNG. As for his role on the MSNBC "Ends of the Earth" show, it's not clear that "starred" is an accurate description — the only "John Stevenson" I can find searching the MSNBC web site is a different one, the movie director. The recent history of the article is convoluted (prod, deprod, reprod, questionable A7 speedy) so I think the deleting admin is doing the right thing by restoring and letting it come to a full AfD, but I don't think it should end up changing the outcome of the case. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:45, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, I watched the video clip linked as a source for the MSNBC piece. It's a four-minute mini-feature on Iceland, shown on the Today show. Stevenson has I think two five-second clips in it, one of which shows his name. Ten seconds of fame? I think that's not enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:02, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not come close to passing WP:PROF or WP:GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 13:13, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - up-and-coming postdoc, but badly fails WP:PROF. When he gets a tenured position or chair, he can come back here. Bearian (talk) 19:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.