Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Rutland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:52, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John Rutland[edit]

John Rutland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently resoundingly non-notable bit-part actor. I tried to rewrite this but was unable to find any reliably-sourced information beyond a passing mention in the autobiography of Peter Sallis and the listing of his rôles on the BFI website. I couldn't – and still can't – see the sort of in-depth coverage that would both justify having an article about him and enable us to write one. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 19:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 19:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the only way there was a second mention of a role was with "a bit part in Chariots of Fire", Rutland's role in that film was so minor it does not appear on our 17 name long list of the cast.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.