Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Ruhlin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:56, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John Ruhlin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on a salesman and "corporate gifting" consultant. No sign that WP:GNG is met based on the references; his book Giftology doesn't seem enough to meet WP:NAUTHOR either. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:29, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:53, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:53, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LEAN KEEP - Updated ref to include papers, incl brief NYT reference, and book details. WP:GNG barely, I'd say 82.117.94.96 (talk) 18:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no where near meeting any inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:18, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP - Updated several links, appears to be recent news. WP:GNG yes. 82.117.94.96 (talk) 18:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Ruhlin is a CEO and verified author. Content is neutral and sources are reliable. WP:GNG yes. Suntancity78 (talk) 19:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:ANYBIO nor WP:NAUTHOR. Promo 'cruft. Being a a CEO and verified author is an insufficient claim of significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:27, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Canton rep source is the best that exists for this subject and that is a fairly weak source anyway and alone isn't enough to pass WP:GNG. While also factoring in that this is a BLP, the reasonable course of action is deletion. W 42 13:34, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP - I have added multiple reputable sources to the page and significant content to show that Ruhlin is enough to meet WP:ANYBIO. He has demonstrated significant contribution to strategies in business. With sources added it is enough to pass WP:GNG. Suntancity78 (talk) 17:22, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
MILD KEEP - I like what Mr. Suntancity added. Not much, but meet WP:GNG. 82.117.88.217 (talk) 13:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the first and third "keep" votes were made by the same IP. The eighth "keep" vote was almost definitely made by the same person or a friend of the IP who made the first and third "keep" votes, just under a slightly different IP address. The fourth and seventh "keep" votes were both made by the same registered user (who created the page). Just thought I would point that out. :)--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 16:05, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.