Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Percy (politician) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 12:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John Percy (politician)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN.--NL19931993 (talk) 22:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:17, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:17, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Percy has stool for electin to the provincial legislature as a ciandidate for a minor party, and lost. He has chared that minor party in one of Canada's small provinces. Not a notable person.NotButtigieg (talk) 16:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 04:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Following my speedy close of the DRV at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 January 10 I am relisting this. Note that the nominator's opinion should be discounted, as they have been banned, but subsequent good faith !votes should be assessed as normal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Amakuru (talk) 10:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merged and redirect as proposed. Do not delete, sufficient sources for covering him, whether as a bio or on his party page, it’s a question of BIO1E. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He does not pass the notability guidelines for politicians and these exist because without there guidelines all politicians would be deemed notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:58, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.