Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Lemp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Lemp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional and non-notable.The refs are PR, mostly with not even a pretension to NPOV or reliability. Article written by declared paid editor. DGG ( talk ) 20:25, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:08, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:09, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:09, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – non-notable subject. Lacks in-depth coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources, instead relies heavily on primary sources. Promotional tone. Citobun (talk) 14:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom as non-notable, also failing WP:BIO. Ifnord (talk) 17:19, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.