Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Larkin (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Scatman John and delete history per consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:32, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Larkin (album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently blanked and redirected by TenPoundHammer with the comment "not notable". However our policy is that we decide such things by consensus, not the actions of a single editor. Accordingly I bring this (and the other album articles) to AfD - although I have no personal opinion either way. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:49, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete released on a small label, no sources. It should be noted that WP:NALBUMS approves of redirection of album articles with little more than a tracklist, so my redirection was not off base. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:48, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete released over 25 years ago so there may be offline sources, but there is scant evidence online that the album was ever notable. Unless someone can provide evidence of a reliable source, a redirect seems sensible. Sionk (talk) 11:48, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.