Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John K. Edmunds (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John K. Edmunds[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable subject that continues to fail WP:BASIC. Arguments for article retention in the first AfD discussion were hunch- and opinion-based, whereby some users made up their own notability criteria, rather than basing notability upon Wikipedia's guidelines. The second AfD discussion received minimal input. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:57, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:57, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:57, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:57, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lack of substantive sources independent of the subject and his church. Reywas92^Talk 20:50, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as in the first nomination, I fail to see notability.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:22, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.