Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John James Holliday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin | wasn't he just...? 20:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John James Holliday[edit]

Delete Not notable per WP:BIO and no sources to indicate notability. Veritas (talk) 14:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TheProf | Talk 15:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Ha, a Bush family ancestor I missed. Insufficient independent notability. But he did found Holliday, Missouri.--Michael White^T·C

Delete I'm dating a Bush family descendant. Doesn't make him notable Carter | Talk to me 16:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, is it Lauren Bush? ;-P --Michael White^T·C 16:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a "her", then, not a "him", yes? Powers ^T 19:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I guess I didn't parse what Carter was saying well enough, you know how that happens? --Michael White^T·C 22:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very weak delete. Notability borderline, but on the wrong side of the border. Powers ^T 19:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:BIO and no sources to indicate notability.Paste (talk) 21:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.