Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John H. Hughes (academic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:11, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John H. Hughes (academic)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Search does not bring up notable awards or accomplishments. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 04:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 04:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:17, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete An academic with a long and varied career (the vita at the first link is quite comprehensive) but I don't see anything there that would satisfy NPROF or GNG criteria. Unless featuring in regional Who's Whos is now a factor, which I doubt? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.