Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Coxhead

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:48, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John Coxhead[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Authors. Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 January 21. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I find no independent sources. He could be evaluated under NACADMIC but would fail at that. His one book appears to be a publication of his thesis with a non-editorial press. I don't believe his position as "honorary professor of practice" meets the notability requirements for appointments. Lamona (talk) 21:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't appear to meet the notability guidelines or have any reliable sources. StarryNightSky11 ☎ 02:56, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Police-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.