Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Allen Borgman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Chetblong^{T C} 01:44, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Allen Borgman[edit]

I'm sure he was a very nice man, albeit an utterly non-notable one. I do believe every one of those hits is a Wiki mirror farm Travellingcari (talk) 18:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, fails WP:BIO. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, while it certainly seems from the article as though this guy did a ton of stuff, he never did anything really substantial. His main claim to notability is that he was a postmaster, which isn't exactly an uncommon position, seeing as how there is one for every individual post office. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable, per nom. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Gary King (talk) 09:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. The related article on Charles B. Gregg should probably be deleted as well.BWH76 (talk) 09:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done actually tagged it for speedy since that one doesn't even assert any notability Travellingcari (talk) 00:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.