Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John A. Oremus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that there is insufficient coverage available in reliable sources to determine the notability of the subject under Wikipedia's notability guidelines, particularly the notability guidelines for politicians. Mz7 (talk) 17:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John A. Oremus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local officeholder fails to meet threshold for notability Mpen320 (talk) 00:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Bridgeview is not large enough that being its mayor would constitute an automatic WP:NPOL pass in and of itself, but this cites no reliable source coverage to get him over WP:GNG in lieu. Bearcat (talk) 15:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:POLITICIAN, WP:GNG, WP:N and he is not a notable businessman.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:43, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Bridgeview had less than 15,000 people the entire time he was mayor. This is way to minor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.