Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John A. Hiigli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:14, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John A. Hiigli[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Amsterdam Whitney Gallery is a Vanity Gallery and there are insufficient WP:RS to satisfy NARTIST. I couldn't verify the claims of inclusion in "supreMADIsm – Homage to the masters of Russian Constructivism Moscow Museum of Modern Art, Moscow, Russia" The event took place, per [1] but it is unclear to what degree he participated, and even if so, that one show doesn't satisfy N. There isn't much else on the CV [2] Theredproject (talk) 22:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 22:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 22:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 22:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sourcing on this is really weird. A few journal articles, conference blurbs, patent applications. It is a hodge-podge of factual items rather than review coverage, which is what you would expect for an artist. Museums would provided that secondary appraisal necessary here, but they are not included. three of the four solo shows listed appear to be of the open studio variety. What I see here is just a jumble of facts and very little secondary interpretation of the work in reliable sources. I think it reflects the career of an artist, but not a notable one per our GNG standards, and certainly not per our WP:ARTIST standards.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:51, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see nothing that looks like critical engagement with the work. Reviews, a book, a collection. Vexations (talk) 15:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.