Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Jett (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mhhossein ^talk 19:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Joey Jett

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability requirements. Was previously evaluated for deletion and was found inconclusive at the time. Notability has not been established since that time. Calvinballing (talk) 23:39, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:08, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:09, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:09, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst (talk) 14:41, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ There was this article about him Joey Jett is ready for liftoff in the children's section of the regional daily when he was a 7-year-old, noted during the first AfD. But overall I concur with Nom, small amount of local/regional coverage doesn't make him h=notable.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:03, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject's notability is not temporary WP:NTEMP. WP:SIGCOV. Non-trivial coverage Monterey Herald, ~~trivial>Port Discovery~~, CBS Baltimore, Baltimore Times, Also beyond regional coverage ~~repeat of Monterey Herald Arkansas Democrat Gazette~~, Washington Examiner. The article needs a rewrite with proper references however WP:NOTCLEANUP. Lightburst (talk) 14:32, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I undertook some article rewrite work, and added proper references. Lightburst (talk) 19:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been better able to establish notability than I expected based on my own searching. Thanks! I update my position to Keep at this point. Calvinballing (talk) 12:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes the general notability guidelines do to significant coverage found in reliable sources. Dream Focus 15:45, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY; good work by Lightburst. Bearian (talk) 13:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep There are two unique biographical features on this person in RS (Baltimore Style and Washington Examiner, the latter story being syndicated outside of the Washington-Baltimore metroplex) separated by a period of a decade. There are also two non-biographical features in RS (Baltimore Sun and a local Baltimore TV station) that are more than simply incidental mentions. In my opinion this gets it over the GNG requirements, albeit just barely. The loss of even one of these sources would make Joey not notable. Chetsford (talk) 17:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There's enough independent sourcing there to pass GNG; I made a few tweaks just now to tidy up some of the wording, but the current sourcing looks decent. GirthSummit _(blether) 18:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.