Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel T. LeFevre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:22, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joel T. LeFevre[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is the former editor of a non-notable newsletter and webmaster of some obscure websites. The only secondary sources are two brief mentions in SPLC articles. Google News and Proquest news archive have nothing on him. Based on the unsourced addition of his birthdate and his wife's name, I'd assume that the subject is editing the article and removed a PROD tag. Will Beback talk 20:47, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 20:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 20:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 20:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No evidence of notability in reliable secondary sources.--JayJasper (talk) 18:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Despite the article's subject appearing in various publications, the available information about him does not indicate notability. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:03, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.